Universal Underwriters Insurance v. A. Richard Kacin, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• nothing that “an insurer’s right to subrogation is limited to the rights of the insured” and “there can be no subrogation where an insured has no cause of action against a defendant”
• nothing that “an insurer’s right to subrogation is limited to the rights of the insured” and “there can be no subrogation where an insured has no cause of action against a defendant”
• “Appellants violated [Pa.R.A.P.] 2119 in that the argument section of their brief is not divided into sections corresponding to each of their questions presented.”
• “Our 2017-08905-TT caselaw is clear that, in defending against a motion for summary judgment, the non-moving party’s decision to pursue one argument over another carries the certain consequence of waiver for those arguments that could have been raised but were not.”
• “Our 2017-08907-TT caselaw is clear that, in defending against a motion for summary judgment, the non-moving party’s decision to pursue one argument over another carries the certain consequence of waiver for those arguments that could have been raised but were not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).