Skip to main content
· 11/7/1966

Federal Case

Citations

  • 367 F.2d 866

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • mentioning the “principal purpose” inquiry but apparently requiring only a “substantial controversy” on any issue between parties
  • “The lower court’s reasoned opinion as to the status of local law in which it acts should not be overturned unless we are convinced that it is clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.