Universal Terminal & Stevedoring Corp. v. Isbrandtsen Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to apply per se rule where plaintiff did not allege suppliers conspired “among themselves,” but rather that one distributor “separately coerced each of the suppliers into boycotting” plaintiff, thus forming “a rimless, spoked wheel”
• “The allegation of unspecified contracts with unnamed other entities to achieve unidentified anticompetitive effects does not meet the minimum standards for pleading a conspiracy in violation of the Sherman Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).