Skip to main content
· 12/13/1965

Universal Security Ins. v. Zambie

Citations

  • 239 Ark. 1076
  • 396 S.W.2d 842
  • 1965 Ark. LEXIS 1146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appellant failed to show motion to suppress drugs discovered during pat-down would have been granted in light of account of officer who observed pat-down and appellant’s failure to call the officer who conducted the pat-down as a witness at the motion for new trial hearing
  • appellant failed to show motion to suppress drugs discovered during pat down would have been granted in light of account of officer who observed pat down and appellant’s failure to call the officer who conducted the pat down as a witness at the motion for new trial hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.