Universal Products Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a double jeopardy claim “is not really an appropriate basis for a § 1983 claim and is more properly asserted in the state trial and appellate courts” where the criminal prosecution is pending or in a petition for habeas corpus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).