Universal Premium Acceptance Corp. v. Pat City Livery, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming lower court’s dismissal of a plaintiffs third complaint on the basis of collateral estoppel because plaintiffs two prior complaints were identical to the third complaint and had been dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
• affirming lower court’s dismissal of a plaintiffs third complaint on the basis of collateral estoppel because plaintiffs two prior complaints were identical to the third complaint and had been dismissed for lack of subject matterjurisdiction
• affirming lower court’s dismissal of a plaintiff’s third complaint on the basis of collateral estoppel because plaintiff’s two prior complaints were identical to the third complaint and had been dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
• summarily affirming a collateral estoppel-based dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction against a serial litigant
• summarily affirming a collateral estoppel-based 12(b)(1) ruling against a plaintiff who had previously filed two similar complaints, “both of which were dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).