Universal Outdoor, Inc. v. Elk Grove Village

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment for defendants where Privacy Act plaintiffs offered no evidence to support their cursory declarations that they suffered “anger, dismay, anxiety and fear.”
• granting summary judgment for defendants where Privacy Act plaintiffs offered no evidence to support their cursory declarations that they suffered “anger, dismay, anxiety and fear.”
• “Proof of adverse effect alone does not entitle plaintiffs to recovery under the Privacy Act without a further showing of ‘actual damages.’” (quoting Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614, 625 (2004))
• plaintiffs demonstrated standing at summary judgment “by submitting [uncontested] declarations . . . in which named plaintiffs claim to have suffered ‘anger, dismay, anxiety, and fear about what has occurred and what could happen’”
• plaintiffs demonstrated standing at summary judgment “by submitting [uncontested] declarations . . . in which named plaintiffs claim to have suffered ‘anger, dismay, anxiety, and fear about what has occurred and what could happen’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).