Universal Match Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[t]he conduct of the parties under a' contract plays an important role in interpreting it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dynamics Corporation of America, as Successor in Interest to International Fermont, Inc. v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1968-01-19· cited 79×
• Macke Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1972-10-13· cited 42×
• Albert J. Jansen, Doing Business as Mercury Service v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1965-04-16· cited 33×
• Missouri Baptist Hospital v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1977-04-20· cited 28×
• The Franklin Company v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1967-07-20· cited 20×
• General Warehouse Two, Inc. v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1967-10-13· cited 18×
• Ace Construction Company, a Corporation v. The United States
  Court of Claims· 1968-10-18· cited 12×
• Northbridge Electronics, Inc. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1966-04-15· cited 12×
• Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1967-03-17· cited 10×
• Tektel, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2013-12-04· cited 3×
• Vassar v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2004-12-08· cited 2×
• Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1967-02-17· cited 2×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Houston Ready-Cut House Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1951-04-03· cited 24×
• Union Paving Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1953-10-06· cited 13×
• Central Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1945-04-02· cited 8×
• Chahroudi v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1953-04-07· cited 6×