Skip to main content
· 7/20/1967

Universal Manufacturing Co. v. Lewis

Citations

  • 381 F.2d 819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • without information as to the “hours devoted to various general activities the court cannot know the nature of the services for which compensation is sought.”
  • need for district judge to “set forth as specifically as possible the facts that support his conclusion”
  • evidentiary hearing required because of likelihood of disputed and incomplete facts in the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.