Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Renaissance Women's Group, P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that contract language should be interpreted as a matter of law if it can be given a certain or definite meaning
• holding that trial court erred in submitting jury charge question on interpretation of unambiguous contract and rendering a take-nothing judgment against claimants
• explaining that a contract is ambiguous if it is subject to two or more A reasonable @ interpretations after applying the pertinent rules of construction
• stating that a court should be cautious in implying a covenant to reflect the parties’ intent
• stating that a court should be cautious in implying a covenant to reflect the parties’ intent
• stating that in “rare circumstances, ... a court may imply a covenant in order to reflect the parties’ real intentions” but “courts must be quite cautious in exercising this power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).