Skip to main content
· 6/17/2022

UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC. v. LORI BELINDA HICKS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a statutory deadline for a response does not make such response mandatory but rather subjects the non-responding party to a confession of error analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.