Universal Foundry Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Employee’s “informational picketing” held to be “a violation ... of the collective bargaining agreement ... [constituting] a willful interference with the company’s interests and, therefore, ... misconduct.”
• where multiple inferences may be drawn from the evidence, the drawing of one such permissible inference by LIRC is an act of fact finding, and the inference so derived is conclusive on the reviewing court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).