Universal Credit Co. v. Durham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “what justifies the use of pseudonyms here is plaintiff’s status as an accused perpetrator of sexual misconduct—a rapist”
• observing that compelling disclosure of accused student- plaintiff's identity \may discourage victims from reporting sexual misconduct in the first instance\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).