Universal City Studios Productions LLLP v. Bigwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing authority but declining to enjoin infringement of future works based on an inadequate showing of a threat of future infringement where defendant was deemed to have admitted to distributing only two movies over a file-sharing network
• recognizing authority but declining to enjoin infringement of future works based on an inadequate showing of a threat of future infringement where defendant was deemed to have admitted to distributing only two movies over a file-sharing network
• “[B]y downloading files containing the Motion Pictures, [d]efendant infringed [p]laintiffs’ exclusive right of reproduction.”
• “[B]y using [a peer- to-peer network] to make copies of the Motion Pictures available to thousands of people over the internet, [d]efendant violated Plaintiffs’ exclusive right to distribute the Motion Pictures.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).