Universal Casualty Co. v. Lopez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insured's default in failing to answer automobile insurer's complaint could not be attributed to nondefaulting injured third party defendants
• holding that insured's default in failing to answer automobile insurer's complaint could not be attributed to nondefaulting injured third party defendants
• a default is regarded as an admission of the material facts stated in the complaint
• a default is regarded as an admission of the material facts stated in the complaint
• “In general, a default is regarded as an admission of the material facts stated in the complaint.”
• “Where an insurer is not prepared to meet its burden of proof ***, a court may properly refuse to enter a default judgment in the insurer’s favor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).