Universal Carloading & Distributing Co. v. Railroad Retirement Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Holding that an employee that 23 “voluntarily quit[s] alternative employment without good reason” has accepted a “willful 24 loss of earnings.”
• explaining defendants had the burden of showing the plaintiff could have mitigated her damages
• denial of any back pay appropriate when claimant failed to mitigate damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).