Univ. Hts. v. Weizman

Citations

• 2026 Ohio 733

Syllabus

Public nuisance; receiver; R.C. 3767.41; Civ.R. 65(B)(2). The court did not err by finding that the defendant's property was a public nuisance. Evidence in the record established that the property was not fit for human habitation as well as being a fire hazard, which are two ways that a property can be deemed a public nuisance. Furthermore, despite the defendant's arguments to the contrary, ample evidence in the record established the property's condition at the time of trial. Additionally, the court did not err by appointing a receiver to clean out the property prior to submitting a viable estimate to repair the property, because a complete repair estimate could not be provided until a clean-out of the property was completed.