Univ. Hts. v. Univ. Realty USA, L.L.C.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3034
Syllabus
Abuse of discretion sentence contrary to law R.C. 2929.22. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by imposing fines on the appellant because the sentence was not contrary to law and within the statutory limits, and therefore, the trial court is presumed to have considered the sentencing factors set forth in R.C. 2929.22.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that this “flexible approach to jury competence to make reasoned decisions about legal performance has worked well in legal malpractice cases”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Laster Mays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.