Univ. Hts. v. Rosskamm

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 5806

Syllabus

Crim.R. 19(D); Traf.R. 14(C); pro se; magistrate's decision; failure to object; speedy-trial calculation; motion to dismiss; illegal stop; plain-error analysis; no errors. Defendant-appellant failed to object to the magistrate's findings of fact and conclusions of law and, thereby, waived his objections to the court's decision on appeal besides plain error. Our review of the case does not find any errors occurred in the trial court. Appellant's two assignments of error are properly overruled.