Unitel Corp. v. Decker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on prima facie proof to support holding that applicant had shown probable injury pending trial and also noting that “it is undisputed” that defendants who were breaching covenant were using experience acquired from applicant in direct competition with applicant
• relying on prima facie proof to support holding that applicant had shown probable injury pending trial and also noting that “it is undisputed” that defendants who were breaching covenant were using experience acquired from applicant in direct competition with applicant
• distinguished on this ground in Zep, 824 S.W.2d at 663

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).