United Wild Rice, Inc. v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that competition is favored in the law so actions that increase competition are not improper
• stating that “Nelson did not employ wrongful means in carrying out the interference”
• rejecting tortious interference claim where \there has been no showing that [defendant] induced [breaching party] to break with [plaintiff]\
• rejecting tortious interference claim where “there has been no showing that [defendant] induced [breaching party] to break with [plaintiff]”
• no improper interference if the actor does not employ wrongful means and the interference does not constitute an unlawful restraint of trade
• absent showing of interference, no cause of action can lie

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).