W.D. North Carolina· 7/2/1996
United Van Lines, Inc. v. Homburger
Citations
- 932 F. Supp. 139
- 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9861
- 1996 WL 391514
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “[t]he fact that [employee] may have had an agreement with a third party (his employer) as to who would pay all or part of the [moving] charge[g] is legally irrelevant”
- “The Court has the discretion to determine the rate of prejudgment interest and will use the ... post judgment interest rate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert D. Potter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Taylor v. Mayflower Transit, Inc.W.D. North Carolina· 1998-10-13· cited 9×
- Yakubu v. Atlas Van LinesW.D. Virginia· 2004-07-16· cited 3×
- Braid Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. R & L Carriers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-24· cited 3×
- United Van Lines, Inc. v. GaryE.D. Missouri· 1998-05-18· cited 1×
- United Van Lines, Inc. v. HenryE.D. Missouri· 1998-07-19
- United Van Lines, LLC v. Crye-Leike, Inc.E.D. New York· 2013-10-29
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-05-14· cited 7,008×
- Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Fourth Circuit· 1985-04-12· cited 754×
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1984-06-07· cited 675×
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1922-11-13· cited 629×
- Maislin Industries, U. S., Inc. v. Primary Steel, Inc.Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 508×
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 412×
- Edward and Nancy Hughes v. United Van Lines, Inc., and 291 Sisser Brothers, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1987-09-11· cited 173×
- Donald L. Cleveland Christa A. Cleveland v. Beltman North American Co., Inc. N. American Van LinesSecond Circuit· 1994-07-27· cited 73×
- John J. Cleckner and Ruth Cleckner, His Wife v. Republic Van and Storage Company, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1977-07-29· cited 62×
- Aero Trucking, Inc. v. Regal Tube Company, and Third Party v. William Crum, Third PartyThird Circuit· 1979-03-14· cited 47×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Liggett & Myers Incorporated, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Liggett & Myers IncorporatedFourth Circuit· 1982-09-28· cited 41×
- Southern Pacific Company, a Corporation of the State of Delaware v. Miller Abattoir Company, a Corporation of the State of New JerseyThird Circuit· 1972-01-12· cited 37×
- Beers v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1988-02-03· cited 34×
- Coliseum Cartage Co. v. Rubbermaid Statesville, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1992-09-16· cited 14×
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. HankeyLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1963-01-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.