United Van Lines, Inc. v. Homburger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he fact that [employee] may have had an agreement with a third party (his employer) as to who would pay all or part of the [moving] charge[g] is legally irrelevant”
• “The Court has the discretion to determine the rate of prejudgment interest and will use the ... post judgment interest rate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).