Skip to main content
· 3/31/1999

United Transportation Union v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company

Citations

  • 172 F.3d 582
  • 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2991
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5772
  • 1999 WL 173642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • characterizing a “major” dispute as involving the creation of contractual rights
  • “ ‘[W]hen the surrounding circumstances are ambiguous, the court’s favor construing the dispute as minor.’ ”
  • “ ‘[Wjhen the surrounding circumstances are ambiguous, the court’s favor construing the dispute as minor.’ ”
  • “The purpose of the [first] inquiry ... is to determine whether [the] case implicates a question of contract interpretation.”
  • the court need not interpret the terms of the agreement, but instead inquires whether the case implicates a question of contract interpretation
  • “The purpose of the [first] inquiry ... is to determine whether [the] case implicates a question of contract interpretation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Wollman, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.