· 3/31/1999
United Transportation Union v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Citations
- 172 F.3d 582
- 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2991
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5772
- 1999 WL 173642
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- characterizing a “major” dispute as involving the creation of contractual rights
- “ ‘[W]hen the surrounding circumstances are ambiguous, the court’s favor construing the dispute as minor.’ ”
- “ ‘[Wjhen the surrounding circumstances are ambiguous, the court’s favor construing the dispute as minor.’ ”
- “The purpose of the [first] inquiry ... is to determine whether [the] case implicates a question of contract interpretation.”
- the court need not interpret the terms of the agreement, but instead inquires whether the case implicates a question of contract interpretation
- “The purpose of the [first] inquiry ... is to determine whether [the] case implicates a question of contract interpretation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMillian, Wollman, Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.