· 6/23/1992
United Transportation Union v. Southern California Rapid Transit District
Citations
- 7 Cal. App. 4th 804
- 9 Cal. Rptr. 2d 702
- 92 Daily Journal DAR 8626
- 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5503
- 143 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2050
- 1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 802
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[W]e hold that we are not bound by the definition of ‘employer’ in the Labor-Management Relations Act when we determine whether the dispute between the Union and the District should be arbitrated.”
- “[W]e hold that we are not bound by the definition of ‘employer’ in the Labor- Management Relations Act when we determine whether the dispute between the Union and the District should be arbitrat- ed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Croskey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.