Skip to main content
· 11/10/1992

United Transportation Union v. Cuyahoga Valley Railway Company

Citations

  • 979 F.2d 431
  • 141 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2749
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 29276
  • 1992 WL 321246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that “[w]hen it is unclear whether a dispute is [minor or major], the dispute should be characterized as minor if the [party’s] actions are ‘arguably justified by the terms of the parties’ collective-bargaining agreement”
  • noting no dispute regarding the meaning of the CBA was presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Siler, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.