Skip to main content
· 8/31/1988

United Telephone Company of Missouri, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Johnson Publishing Company, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 855 F.2d 604
  • 8 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1058
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11872

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Fair use is not favored ‘when the user stands to profit from the exploitation of the copyrighted material without paying the customary price.’”
  • \[T]he plaintiff must prove: (1) ownership of the copyright; and (2) 'copying' of protectible expression by the defendant.\
  • “On the assumption that judicial authority teaches that the patent misuse doctrine may be applied or asserted as a defense to copyright infringement, the stipulated facts in this case do not support Johnson’s contention that United Telephone ‘misused’ its copyright.”
  • discussing patent misuse and its application in copyright context

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Re, Wollman, Beam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.