· 1/7/2003
United Technologies Corporation v. United States
Citations
- 315 F.3d 1320
- 24 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1868
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 127
- 2003 WL 42005
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that, when Skidmore deference is warranted, a court engages in statutory interpretation and its “analysis proceeds de novo”
- explaining that, when Skidmore deference is warranted, a court engages in statutory interpretation and its \analysis proceeds de novo\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mayer, Schall, Dyk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.