United Technologies Corp. v. Groppo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[a] trial court cannot compel this court to render advisory type opinions by the simple expedient of reserving questions to this court that do not meet the criteria set forth in General Statutes § 52-235 and Practice Book § 4147 [now § 73-1]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ross
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-06-11· cited 6×
• Capel v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-02· cited 2×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Alabama v. King & Boozer
  Supreme Court· 1941-11-10· cited 391×
• United States v. New Mexico
  Supreme Court· 1982-03-24· cited 272×
• Kern-Limerick, Inc. v. Scurlock
  Supreme Court· 1954-02-08· cited 210×
• Gianetti v. Norwalk Hospital
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-04-25· cited 75×
• Console v. Nickou
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-03-20· cited 61×
• Avco Manufacturing Corp. v. Connelly
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-03-25· cited 42×
• Yale University v. Benneson
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-03-15· cited 33×
• United Aircraft Corp. v. Connelly
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1958-03-25· cited 28×
• Makar v. Zoning Board of Appeals
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-03-08· cited 15×
• Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Greenwich Catholic Elementary School System, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-24· cited 15×
• Barr v. First Taxing District
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1960-03-01· cited 14×
• Hoblitzelle v. Frechette
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1968-03-14· cited 14×
• Wiegert v. Pequabuck Golf Club, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1963-03-08· cited 11×
• Duggins v. H.N.S. Management Co.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-06-28· cited 5×