United Sweetener USA, Inc. v. Nutrasweet Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Insofar as [the] PTO is concerned, any submission by an applicant which includes (1) the applicant's views, and (2) the views of another, is a response by the applicant.”
• despite the fact that the ’189 patent had been twice rejected in prior re-examination proceedings the court believed it to be more efficient to allow the administrative study of the patent to conclude before pressing on toward trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).