United Structures of America, Inc. v. G.R.G. Engineering

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recog-nizing that compensation is primarily a devise allowing the convenient simplification of relations between mutually indebted parties
• stating that, “[ijnsofar as [the general contractor] shows that [the supplier] delivered defective goods that failed to meet contract specifications, and proves ... damages caused by those defects, [the general contractor] may reduce the award to [the supplier] by the amount of those damages”
• explaining this traditional distinction and noting that modern pleading rules have diminished its importance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).