United Structures of America, Inc. v. Engineering

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evaluating a claim for attorney’s fees first based on “obstinate” conduct pursuant to Rule 44.1(d), then evaluating the same claim for “vexatious” conduct under 28 U.S.C 1927
• a surety may raise a contractor’s defense, effectively standing in the shoes of the contractor
• “Since a true setoff is not before us, however, we need only note the difference and need not go beyond the subject of recoupment to consider when or whether setoff is unavailable under the Miller Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).