United Steelworkers v. Phelps Dodge Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that personal injury is not \injury to business or property \ and is therefore not compensable under RICO
• holding that plaintiffs suffered no damages under RICO because it was undisputed that they did not incur any out-of-pocket expenses as a result of defendants' conduct
• stating that loss of security and peace of mind are not recoverable injuries under RICO
• loss of security and peace of mind due to cancellation of insurance policy not actionable
• loss of security and peace of mind due to cancellation of insurance policy were not actionable under RICO
• “[P]ersonal injury, including emotional distress, is not 16 compensable under section 1964(c) of RICO.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).