United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio v. Canron, Inc., and Warren Pipe & Foundry Division

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a union’s standing without finding that the retirees had consented to the suit
• finding coverage under the CBA when “[t]he parties reasonably differ as to its meaning”
• “[A]rbitration of this dispute may be compelled . . . regarding the 12 payment of premiums for medical and health insurance coverage of retired 13 employees.”
• applying the presumption and collecting cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).