Skip to main content
· 10/24/1910

United Steamship Co. v. Societe Nouvelle d'Armement

Citations

  • 218 U.S. 674
  • 31 S. Ct. 223
  • 54 L. Ed. 1205
  • 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]he function of the courts in relation to taxes is ... to review legislation and executive-administrative action and to determine their correctness”
  • “In construing an ambiguous contract, three well-recognized rules of construction require: (1) that the intentions of the parties to the agreement must control the obligations thereunder; (2
  • in interpreting a contract, a court should give effect to every clause
  • “Each word in a contract is presumed to have a unique meaning and, thus, no word or clause is to be treated as a redundancy, if any meaning reasonable and consistent with other parts can be given to it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.