United States v. Zhi Yong Guo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a scienter requirement in the statute “alleviates any concern over the complexity of the regulatory scheme”
• rejecting vagueness challenge to export violation because export laws, although complex, could be pieced together to determine whether a particular item was regulated
• “[A] statute does not fail the vagueness test simply because it involves a complex regulatory scheme, or requires that several sources be read together[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).