Skip to main content
· 3/17/1980

United States v. Zeev Dichne

Citations

  • 612 F.2d 632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that reporting requirements invalidated by the Supreme Court generally required disclosure of “information which would almost necessarily provide the basis for criminal proceedings ... for the very activity that [the subject of the reporting requirement] was required to disclose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Oakes, Newman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.