United States v. Zavala-Marti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \the proper procedure is to render a separate sentence on each count\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• explaining that \the proper procedure is to render a separate sentence on each count\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• explaining that \the proper procedure is to render a separate sentence on each count\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• remanding for resentencing by a different judge because the defendant's original life sentence exceeded the statutory maximum and was based in part on ex parte information
• finding sentencing process “inadequate” when district court was briefed ex parte by a probation officer — though not the probation officer assigned to defendant’s case — about defendant’s alleged attempts at intimidation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).