Skip to main content
· 5/18/1995

United States v. Zane Higa, United States of America v. Zane Higa

Citations

  • 55 F.3d 448
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 6341
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3680
  • 42 Fed. R. Serv. 154
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11333
  • 1995 WL 299473

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • leaving undisturbed the § 3B1.3 enhancement imposed on an airline customer service representative who “used his position with the airline to gain entry into areas where others could not” to smuggle drugs
  • “The trial judge has a ‘high degree of flexibility’ in deciding how much inconsis tency is enough to permit use of a prior statement for impeachment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Trott, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.