United States v. Zahursky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] warrantless search is per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment subject to a few well-established exceptions”
• finding probable cause in support of automobile exception to war-rantless search where it was reasonable for officers to believe defendant would leave evidence of his crime in his car
• Under “the automobile exception first recognized in Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925
• officers had probable cause to search vehicle that matched description described in prior online chats and that was driven by man who showed up to a designated location at a designated time
• automobile exception applied because vehicle “was inherently, even if not immediately, mobile”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).