United States v. Zaccaria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even if the district court erred in sustaining the objection, the error was harmless because the witness answered the question in the negative and the court did not strike his answer
• holding that even if the district court erred in sustaining the objection, the error was harmless because the witness answered the question in the negative and the court did not strike his answer
• “[S]ilence per se generally has little or no probative value for impeachment purposes.”
• “[Science per se generally has little or no probative value for impeachment purposes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).