United States v. Z. T. Osborn, Jr., Z. T. Osborn, Jr. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e have repeatedly held that the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction may not be collaterally reviewed on a Section 2255 proceeding.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).