United States v. Yuri Izurieta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the indictment was jurisdictionally defective because it “d[id] not charge a crime”
• “While some regulations may fall under the criminal prohibitions of 18 U.S.C. § 545, the text of 19 C.F.R. § 141.113(c
• “Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent.”
• “Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent.”
• “Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).