Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 9/29/1995
United States v. Youngberg
Citations
- 43 M.J. 379
- 1995 CAAF LEXIS 141
- 1995 WL 799719
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that military judge did not commit 5 United States v. Baas, No. 19-0377/MC Judge MAGGS, concurring in part and in the judgment plain error in admitting scientific evidence, despite the ap- pellant’s complaint that there was no evidence of error rates
- finding that military judge did not commit 5 United States v. Baas, No. 19-0377/MC Judge MAGGS, concurring in part and in the judgment plain error in admitting scientific evidence, despite the ap- pellant’s complaint that there was no evidence of error rates
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox, Crawford, Gierke, Sullivan, Wiss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named United States v. Youngberg
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.