Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 9/29/1995

United States v. Youngberg

Citations

43 M.J. 379
1995 CAAF LEXIS 141
1995 WL 799719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that military judge did not commit 5 United States v. Baas, No. 19-0377/MC Judge MAGGS, concurring in part and in the judgment plain error in admitting scientific evidence, despite the ap- pellant’s complaint that there was no evidence of error rates
finding that military judge did not commit 5 United States v. Baas, No. 19-0377/MC Judge MAGGS, concurring in part and in the judgment plain error in admitting scientific evidence, despite the ap- pellant’s complaint that there was no evidence of error rates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Crawford, Gierke, Sullivan, Wiss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Youngberg

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

United States v. Youngberg
U.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1993-11-05· cited 6×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.