United States v. Yelloweagle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that party abandoned argument on appeal by not mentioning it in his opening brief
• explaining that where an appellant “raises an issue before the district court but does not pursue it on appeal, we ordinarily consider the issue waived”
• stating that a statute was constitutional under the Necessary and Proper Clause because it “represent[ed] a rational means for implementing a constitutional grant of legislative authority” (quoting Comstock, 130 S.Ct. at 1962
• noting that we will not “make arguments for” a litigant
• stating that a statute was constitutional under the Necessary and Proper Clause because it “represent[ed] a rational means for implementing a constitutional grant of legislative authority” (quoting Comstock, 130 S. Ct. at 1962) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that a statute was constitutional under the Necessary and Proper Clause because it “represent[ed] a rational means for implementing a constitutional grant of legislative authority” (quoting Comstock, 130 S. Ct. at 1962) (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).