United States v. Yaya Kone, Feranba Keita, Noha Fofana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that there is no abuse of discretion where “despite the limitation of cross-examination, the jury was otherwise in possession of sufficient information . . . to make a discriminating appraisal of a witness’ motives and bias”
• affirming conviction where defendant did not establish that he was prejudiced from judge’s physical absence from courthouse
• “In order to preserve an issue for appeal . . . [the defendant’s] attorney was obligated to object each time the trial judge limited the attorney’s efforts to cross-examine a particular witness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).