· 7/3/1953
United States v. Wycliff
Citations
- 3 C.M.A. 38
- 3 USCMA 38
- 11 C.M.R. 38
- 1953 CMA LEXIS 794
- 1953 WL 1969
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that prosecutors may not use statements compelled under a threat of removal from office or use any information derived from those statements
- invalidating employee discharge for refusal to answer questions when investigator failed to advise employee that answers and their fruits could not be used against him in criminal prosecution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brosmán, Lati, Mer, Quinn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.