Skip to main content
· 7/3/1953

United States v. Wycliff

Citations

  • 3 C.M.A. 38
  • 3 USCMA 38
  • 11 C.M.R. 38
  • 1953 CMA LEXIS 794
  • 1953 WL 1969

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutors may not use statements compelled under a threat of removal from office or use any information derived from those statements
  • invalidating employee discharge for refusal to answer questions when investigator failed to advise employee that answers and their fruits could not be used against him in criminal prosecution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brosmán, Lati, Mer, Quinn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.