Skip to main content
· 1/14/1991

United States v. Wornom

Citations

  • 754 F. Supp. 517
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 455
  • 1991 WL 3742

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a magistrate judge’s conviction of a defen- dant for speeding based solely on an officer’s visual speed estimate after radar evidence was suppressed
  • where radar evidence was suppressed, affirming conviction of defendant for speeding based on officer’s visual speed estimate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.