Skip to main content
· 10/8/2008

United States v. Worjloh

Citations

  • 546 F.3d 104
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21057
  • 2008 WL 4489847

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the pending state prosecution against [the defendant] had no Sixth Amendment effect on the questioning related to uncharged federal conduct”
  • upholding validity of warrant that classified a multi-family home as a single-family home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Raggi, Haul

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.