· 10/8/2008
United States v. Worjloh
Citations
- 546 F.3d 104
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 21057
- 2008 WL 4489847
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the pending state prosecution against [the defendant] had no Sixth Amendment effect on the questioning related to uncharged federal conduct”
- upholding validity of warrant that classified a multi-family home as a single-family home
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker, Raggi, Haul
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.