United States v. Woodside

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• looking to state law to determine whether plaintiffs had a vested property right in uncapped medical-malpractice damages
• looking to state law to determine whether plaintiffs had a vested property right in uncapped medical-malpractice damages
• “[T]he plaintiffs cite survey data indicating that fewer Texas lawyers are accepting medical malpractice suits after the [statutory] cap was enacted.”
• “[T]he plaintiffs cite survey data indicating that fewer Texas lawyers are accepting medical malpractice suits after the [statutory] cap was enacted.”
• after a state constitutional amendment the court rejected contention the noneconomic damage caps of $250,000/$500,000 violated the U.S. Const. Fifth Amendment Takings Clause or the right to access courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).