Skip to main content
· 8/21/1969

United States v. Woodrow W. Shiver

Citations

  • 414 F.2d 461
  • 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a detective’s testimony that his investigation \revealed” that a certain car was stolen was \pure hearsay, since he could not have known the facts of his own knowledge”
  • testimony by detective that a car was stolen from Miami Beach, Florida, was hearsay because it was based on a report and not his own knowledge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Godbold, Cabot

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.